F. Ashfaq ( Sindh Government Qatar Hospital, Karachi )
A. A. Shah ( Southend General Hospital, Southend, U.K. )
June 2004, Volume 54, Issue 6
Original Article
Introduction
Fetal distress is a widely used but poorly defined term.1 Its use commonly indicates anxiety about fetal condition which is usually assessed by measuring the fetal heart rate and checking for the presence of meconium in the amniotic fluid, and it is often assumed that an abnormal fetal heart rate, especially in the presence of meconium stained liquor, indicates hypoxia and acidosis.
The purpose of this case control study was to evaluate the possible effects of amnioinfusion with respect to effect of amnioinfusion in improving fetal outcome.
Clinical obstetrics throughout this century has practiced the concept that meconium passage is a potential warning of fetal distress. Aspiration of meconium by the fetus remains a relatively common cause of perinatal mortality and morbidity because it is difficult to prevent. The fetus passes meconium into the amniotic fluid in 10% of all pregnancies, in 5% of these (i.e., 1:200 of all pregnancies) the meconium is aspirated into the lungs of the fetus or neonate. This can result in severe respiratory difficulty, the meconium aspiration syndrome. 2
Amnioinfusion is defined as a procedure in which a physiologic solution (such as normal saline or ringer lactate) is infused into the uterine cavity to replace the amniotic fluid. There is evidence that amnioinfusion is associated with improvements in perinatal outcome when used for meconium stained liquor in labour, particularly in hospitals where facilities for perinatal surveillance are limited. 3
Patients and Methods
This study was conducted in Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Jinnah postgraduate Medical Centre, Karachi from 1st January 1998 to 31st December 2000. A total of 400 patients were selected and were equally divided in study and control group. Only patients of gestation more than 37 weeks, presenting in active labour with vertex presentation and presence of meconium on vaginal examination were included and patients with multiple gestation, mal-presentation, previous scar, maternal fever and pre natal diagnosed fetal malformation were excluded from the study.
Patients were admitted through emergency or antenatal clinic and informed consent was taken and then was allocated to either group. Relevant personal details, history, examination, investigations and labour findings were then recorded. Meconium was clinically defined as being thick, tenacious, and opaque and contained significant particulate matter and then these patients were admitted in labour ward.
Amnioinfusion was started by inserting a nasogastric tube transcervically into the uterine cavity just above the fetal presentation. Initially, 500 ml of normal saline or ringer lactate (at room temperature) was infused through the tube over 30 minutes, and then a further 500 ml at a rate of 3ml/min.
The amnioinfusion group and the control group were then managed in the labour ward by the team on duty according to the routine protocol of labour room. The uterine tone and the frequency of the contractions were assessed by palpation and were recorded at baseline and after every one hour. The fetal heart rate was checked ever 15 minutes by intermittent auscultation.
At the time of delivery, the doctor on duty in accordance with the hospital policy conducted delivery. Any decision regarding the mode of delivery was made purely according to the obstetrical indications. The Apgar score of the baby was recorded at 1 minute and 5 minutes.
Results
Four hundred patients were evaluated in this study, 200 were allocated in each group. The different aspects of the study were statistically analyzed and the results were obtained for both the groups. Majority of the patients in our study were not booked for antenatal care. In amnioinfusion group 59% were non-booked, whereas in control group, 64% were non-booked. The mean age was 25.7±4.99 in amnioinfusion group and 26.09±4.37years in control group. Most patients were in active phase of labour at the time of admission.
| Table 1. Colour of admiotic fluid. | ||
| Degree of | Amnioinfusion | Control |
| meconium staining | (n=200) | (n=200) |
| Grade I | 58 (29%) | 64 (2%) |
| Grade II | 112 (56%) | 104 (52%) |
| Grade III | 30 (15%) | 31 (16%) |
| p <0.72, chi square = 0.66 | ||
In majority of the patients meconium was found to be of moderate intensity i.e., 56% in amnioinfusion group and 52% in controls. Lesser number was found to have grade I meconium and least were with grade III meconium
| Table 2. Apgar score at 5 minutes. | ||
| Apgar score | Amnioinfusion | Control |
| (n=200) | (n=200) | |
| Less than 5 | 6 (3%) | 38 (19%) |
| 5 - 7 | 58 (29%) | 100 (50%) |
| >7 | 136 (68%) | 62 (31%) |
| p<0.001, chi square = 62.09 | ||
| Table 3. Fetal outcome. | |||
| Fetal | Amnioinfusion | Control | P value |
| outcome | (n=200) | (n=200) | |
| Born alive | 182 | 164 | <0.01 |
| and healthy | (91%) | (82%) | |
| Still birth | 0 | 8 | <0.01 |
| (0%) | (4%) | ||
| Died within | 12 | 28 | <0.01 |
| 7 days | (6%) | (14%) | |
in the amniotic fluid, as shown in Table 1. Lower rate of Caesarean Section was encountered in patients with amnioinfusion, that is 37% versus 59% in controls. There was a significant difference between the apgar scores calculated in both the groups at 1 minute and at 5 minutes as shown in Table 2. There was no perinatal death in the study group whereas there were 8 (4%) in control group, even in the presence of close monitoring and same management protocol for both the groups. Perinatal mortality was also found to be high in control group as shown in Table 3. Resuscitation was carried out in a similar manner for both the groups but a higher admission rate to the nursery was observed in control group neonates as compared to amnioinfusion group (Table 4).
The incidence of meconium aspiration syndrome was 22% in amnioinfusion group and 56% in control group, (Table 5), indicating that incidence of meconium aspiration syndrome can be reduced by amnioinfusion and thus preventing fetal respiratory compromise in the new born, this was also evident from the improvement in apgar scores at 1 and 5 minutes.
| Table 4. Incidence of mecontium aspiration sydrome. | |
| Amnioinfusion | Control |
| (n=200) | (n=200) |
| 24 (12%) | 70 (35%) |
| 8.02 - 17.07 | 28.62 - 41 - 80 |
| Table 5. Admission to nursery. | |||
| Meconium | Amnioinfusion | Control | p value |
| aspiration | (n=200) | (n=200) | |
| Syndrome present | 44 (22%) | 112 (56%) | <0.001 |
| Chi sq = 48.95 | |||
| Syndrome absent | 156 (78%) | 88 (44%) | <0.01 |
| chi sq = 7.09 | |||
Discussion
The presence of meconium in the amniotic fluid of the foetus in a vertex presentation has been considered to be a sign of foetal distress. Meconium has been associated with increased perinatal morbidity and death, especially when meconium aspiration syndrome is present.4-6 Meconium aspiration syndrome develops when mechanical obstruction and chemical inflammation occur as a result of aspiration of meconium into the lower respiratory tract of the foetus or the neonate. The syndrome is defined as respiratory distress in a neonate with meconium aspiration, with a mortality rate of 25% and it account for 2% of all perinatal death. 6
The presence of meconium is associated with a higher incidence of abnormal labour, foetal distress, delivery by Caesarean section, and low apgar scores. 5
In a study of 238 births with meconium-stained fluid Rossi et al7 found meconium below the cords more commonly in the presence of thick meconium . This finding agrees with the theory that the greater the concentration of the meconium in the amniotic fluid, the more meconium was passed trans tracheally.
Meconium aspiration syndrome is fatal in up to 40% of cases and may occur within minutes of birth.8-10 Initial attempts at reducing morbidity and mortality associated with meconium aspiration syndrome focused on the "combined approach" of Carson et al.11 Their protocol called for nasopharygeal and oropharyngeal suctioning by the obstetrician before delivery of the thorax, followed by suctioning of the trachea under laryngoscopic visualization by the pediatrician. Their data indicated a significant reduction in the incidence of meconium aspiration syndrome with the use of this protocol and rapidly became the standard of care in obstetrics .
In a subsequent investigation Falciglia8 demonstrated that the Dele and tracheal suctioning reduced the severity but not the incidence of meconium aspiration syndrome.
Intrapartum amnioinfusion was initially proposed by Wenstrom and Parsons12 as a way of diluting meconium to decrease the incidence of meconium aspiration syndrome. These investigators showed a significant reduction in the incidence of meconium below the cords. Since this initial report two other prospective randomized trials13,14 and one retrospective review15 have also demonstrated a significant reduction in the incidence of meconium below the cords in patients receiving amnioinfusion. These studies also record a significant reduction in the incidence of Caesarean section for fetal distress. 12,14
Amnioinfusion is a beneficial method and very safe but is not without risk. Controlled studies have not been sufficiently large to address the possibility of rare events such as cord prolapse or maternal complications. In a review of 186 academic departments in the United States in which 22,000 amnioinfusions were performed annually, 49 centres reported complications including uterine hypertonia, fetal heart rate abnormality, uterine rupture and maternal cardiac or pulmonary failure.15 Two maternal deaths associated with amniotic fluid embolus have been reported.16 Several authors have reported the occurrence of excessive uterine contractions or unusually rapid labour progress associated with amnioinfusion. 16,17
Though uncontrolled studies do not prove a causal relation between amnioinfusion and these events, we have put forward the hypothesis that excessive uterine activity in some cases be related to extra amniotic placement of amnioinfusion catheter with stimulation of prostaglandin release. It is possible at least some of the apparent benefits of amnioinfusion may be due to reduction of Caesarean sections performed because of persistent variable fetal heart rate decelerations, rather than a primary beneficial effect on foetal condition. There is therefore no good evidence available of the effectiveness of amnioinfusion in Caesarean section where it is not usually performed for persistent early or variable foetal heart rate decelerations alone. Furthermore, the results of previous studies need to be interpreted with care because of the small numbers observed , with relatively large proportions of participants excluded for failure to adhere to the allocated treatment. 18,19
Conclusion
This study has demonstrated that amnioinfusion is feasible using simple equipment in a developing country without routine electronic fetal monitoring facilities. After data analysis it clearly shows that intrapartum amnioinfusion for meconium stained amniotic fluid, improves foetal outcome as judged by the apgar score and subsequent perinatal mortality. The level of significance in this trial proves beyond doubt that these findings are less likely to be by chance.There was also a significant decrease in the incidence of Caesarean section and meconium aspiration syndrome.
Whatever the mechanism of action, the process of administering amnioinfusion was effective and the results should be applicable to other hospitals with similar levels of intra partum surveillance.Therefore, amnioinfusion being simple to use, cost effective, logical and safe preventive measure, could be routinely incorporated in the management protocol of foetal distress due to meconium stained amniotic fluid and may result in better foetal outcome and lower rates of Caesarean section.
References
1. Steer PJ. Has the expression fetal distress outlined its usefulness? Br J Obstet
Gynaecol 1989;96:690-93.
2. Caltart TM, Byrne DL, Bates SA. Meconium aspiration syndrome: a 6 year
retrospective study. Br J Obs Gynae.1989;96:411-14.
3. Hofmeyr GJ. Amnioinfusion for meconium stained liquor in labour. Cochrane
Database Syst Rev 2002;1:CD 000014.
4. Woods JR Jr, Dolkart LA. Significance of amniotic fluid meconium. In: Creasy RK,
Resnik R, eds. Maternal fetal medicine: principles and practice. Philadelphia: WB
Saunders, 1989, p.404.
5. Mitchell J, Schulman H, Fleisher A, et al. Meconium aspiration and fetal acidosis.
Obstet Gynaecol 1985;65:352-5.
6. Meis BJ, Hall M, Marshall JR, et al. Meconium passage: a new classification for risk
assessment in labour. Am J Obstet Gynaecol 1978;151:509-12.
7. Davis RO, Phillips JB, Harris BA, et al. Fetal meconium aspiration syndrome
occurring despite airway management considered appropriate. Am J Obstet
Gynaecol 1985;151:731-36.
8. Roosi EM, Philipson EH, Williams TG, et al. Meconium aspiration syndrome: intra
partum and neonatal attributes. Am J Obstet Gynaecol 1989;161:1106-10.
9. Falciglia HS. Failure to prevent meconium aspiration syndrome. Obstet Gynaecol
1988; 71:349-53.
10. Mahmoud EL, Benirschke K, Vaucher YE, et al. Motilin levels in term neonates who
have passed meconium prior to birth. J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr 1988;7:95-9.
11. Byrne DL, Gau G. In utero meconium aspiration: an unpreventable cause of
neonatal death. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 1987;94:813-14.
12. Carson BS, Losey RW, Bowes WA, et al. Combined obstetrics and pediatric
approach to prevent meconium aspiration syndrome. Am J Obstetric Gynaecol
1976;126:712-15.
13. Wenstrom K, Parsons MT. The prevention of meconium aspiration in labour using
amnioinfusion. Obstet Gynaecol 1989;73:647-51.
14. Sadovsky Y, Amon E, Bade ME, et al. Prophylactic amnioinfusion during labour
complicated by meconium: a preliminary report. Am J Obstet Gynaecol
1989;161:613-17.
15. Marci CJ, Schrimmer DB, Leung A, et al. Prophylactic amnioinfusion improves
outcome of pregnancy complicated by thick meconium and oligohydramnios. Am J
Obstet Gynaecol 1992;167:117-21.
16. Uhing MR, Bhat R, Philobos M, et al. Value of amnioinfusion in reducing meconium
aspiration syndrome. Am J Perinatol 1993;167:117-21.
17. Maher JE, Wenstrom KD, Hanth JC, et al. Amniotic fluid embolism after saline
amnioinfusion: two cases and review of literature. Obstet Gynaecol 1994; 83:851.
18. Dibble LA, Elliot JB. Possible amniotic fluid embolism with amnioinfusion. J Matern
Fetal Med 1992;1:263-6.
19. Hofmeyr GJ. Amnioinfusion for meconium stained liquor in labour. In: Nielson JP,
Crowther CA, Hodnett E, Hofmeyr, et al. eds. Pregnancy and childbirth module of the
cochrane database of systematic reviews (updated 6th September 1996). Available
in: The Cochrane Library. The Cochrane Collaboration, issue 2. Oxford: Updated
Software, 1997.
Abstract
Objective:
To see the effect of amnioinfusion on perinatal outcome in cases of meconium staining of liquor.
Methods:
This study was conducted in department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, unit I, Jinnah Postgraduate Medical Centre, Karachi, from 1st January 1998 to 31st December 2000. Four hundred patients were included in this study, assigning 200 for amnioinfusion and 200 as control. All patients were matched in both the groups with respect to age, antenatal booking, parity, gestational age, stage of labour, colour of amniotic fluid and fetal birth weight. Both the groups were found to be comparable.
Results:
The rate of Caesarean section was found to be 37% in amnioinfusion group, which collaborates with other international studies. The fetal outcome was better i.e. 91% alive and healthy, after amnioinfusion due to dilution of meconium stained amniotic fluid with physiological solutions. The perinatal outcome was recorded by Apgar score at 5 minutes. The perinatal morbidity and mortality both were significantly lowered and was found to be 6% as compared to 14% in control, which was also noticed by less number of admissions in nursery i.e. 12% and perinatal deaths. The incidence of meconium aspiration syndrome was found to be 56% in control and was reduced to 22% after amnioinfusion in the other arm of the study.
Conclusion:
These results are very encouraging and suggestion can be safely made that in future amnioinfusion will be the ideal method of preventing fetal distress due to meconium stained amniotic fluid (JPMA 54:322;2004).
Related Articles
Journal of the Pakistan Medical Association has agreed to receive and publish manuscripts in accordance with the principles of the following committees:




