Ismail Memon ( Department of Biological & Biomedical Sciences (Anatomy), Aga Khan University, Karachi, Pakistan. )
February 2009, Volume 59, Issue 2
Letter to the Editor
Madam, Teaching of basic medical sciences generally and anatomy particularly has been diluted in the medical curricula globally during past 2-3 decades. This reduction in anatomy teaching has started showing the consequences in clinical practice, patient care, and medical education. The new, student centered teaching methodology, and the problem based learning (PBL) does have a positive outcome in understanding the clinical aspects of a disease. On the other hand the depth of basic medical sciences knowledge has been observed to be lacking among the students. It is still debatable, to what extent the basic medical sciences knowledge is needed for becoming a good doctor.
Nobody can deny the fact that, comprehensive knowledge of human anatomy is essential to understand the pathophysiology and comprehend obstetrics/gynaecology, orthopaedics, dentistry, and general surgery.1 In order to answer the question as to how much detail of anatomy one needs to know, we can go through some literature, and also look upon certain prevailing conditions in the medical schools of our own country.
Trainers of surgery complain that students entering in surgery training are ill equipped with anatomical knowledge, than what is needed for this field.2
The reduction of anatomy in the medical curriculum has given grave consequences experienced in patient care, diagnosis and treatment.3 Sophisticated imaging techniques such as, NMR, MRI, CT scanning, ultrasonography and mammography are becoming essential to diagnose and treat the medical and surgical problems. To interpret the images, a detailed knowledge of relevant anatomy is essential.
In
Though, spiral curriculum in PBL system, and vertical training of anatomy, claim continuous teaching of the subject throughout the undergraduate medical curriculum, unfortunately, like
In the above scenario, teaching of human anatomy as a discipline is facing its toughest time. New curricula are discouraging detailed teaching of anatomy and cadaver dissection is almost stopped. This is an alarming situation, and requires all medical professionals therefore, to ponder upon and come forward and comment on the anticipated positive and negative aspects of the future of anatomy teaching. Furthermore, there is a strong need in our country to conduct research studies for devising medical curriculum that should be rationally balanced with basic sciences and clinical knowledge.
References
2. Fasel JH, Morel P, Gailloud P. A survival strategy for anatomy. Lancet 2005; 365:754.
3. Fraher J. Anatomy 2020: The view from across the pond. Newsletter of American Association of Anatomists 2007; 16: 1-10.
4. Gogalniceanu P, Madani H, Paraskeva AP, Darzi A. Anatomy teaching in the 21st century - dead cool or cold dead? Anat Sci Ed 2008; 1:136-7.
5. Whitcomb ME.. The teaching of basic sciences in medical schools. Acad Med 2006; 81: 413-4.
6. Sarah Joslin. Perceptions of Anatomy Education. A Student's View. Anat Sci Ed 2008; 1: 133-4.
Journal of the Pakistan Medical Association has agreed to receive and publish manuscripts in accordance with the principles of the following committees:




