Abbas Basiri ( Urology and Nephrology Research Center, Department of Urology, Shaheed Labbafinejad Hospital, Shahid Beheshti University (MS), Tehran, Iran )
Ardalan Ozhand ( Urology and Nephrology Research Center, Department of Urology, Shaheed Labbafinejad Hospital, Shahid Beheshti University (MS), Tehran, Iran )
Hormoz Karami ( Urology and Nephrology Research Center, Department of Urology, Shaheed Labbafinejad Hospital, Shahid Beheshti University (MS), Tehran, Iran )
Halimi Asl Parham ( Urology and Nephrology Research Center, Department of Urology, Shaheed Labbafinejad Hospital, Shahid Beheshti University (MS), Tehran, Iran )
Mohammad Reza Safarinejad ( Urology and Nephrology Research Center, Department of Urology, Shaheed Labbafinejad Hospital, Shahid Beheshti University (MS), Tehran, Iran )
September 2008, Volume 58, Issue 9
Original Article
Abstract
Materials: The files of the patients who had been subjected to radical cystectomy due to bladder TCC between 1998 and 2004 were evaluated retrospectively. A total of 164 radical cystectomies had been done during this period. .Seventeen cases were excluded because the primary tumour was not TCC or the patient had previously undergone prostatectomy.
Results: Of 147 patients, 36 (24/4%) had prostate TCC and 19 (12.9%) had prostate adenocarcinoma. Two patients had both TCC and prostate adenocarcinoma. Twenty-one cases had superficial bladder cancer (T1) and prostatic involvement was detected in TCC cases but in 9.5% of those with adenocarcinoma. The prevalence of prostate adenocarcinoma in radical cystectomy samples (due to bladder TCC) is much lower in Iranian patients in comparison with the European and American patients (vs 12.9 and 17.5 to 45%, respectively).
Conclusion: Prostatic involvement by TCC had a direct relation with the stage (P=.01) and grade (P=.008) of the bladder tumour. If we try to preserve the prostate or its capsule during the radical cystectomy procedure, attention to these findings is worthwhile (JPMA 58:479;2008).
Introduction
Radical cystectomy is the treatment of choice for muscle invasive transitional cell carcinoma (TCC) of the bladder.8 Of the most important complications of radical cystectomy is erectile dysfunction or impotence due to the cutting of neurovascular bundle during the excision of prostate.8
A proposed method for preservation of neurovascular bundle is radical cystectomy with prostatic capsule preservation. During the capsule sparing surgery, a piece of the peripheral tissue of the prostate is preserved with the capsule. Since the involvement of prostatic capsule in TCC is reported to be about 43%, keeping this residue may result in tumour recurrence. However, due to preservation of the external sphincter, better continence is achieved and the probability of stricture formation in the anastomosis area is reduced. Incidental prostatic adenocarcinoma in patients with PSA less than 4 ng/mL undergoing radical cystoprostatectomy for bladder cancer in Iranian men is 14%,9 but involvement of prostate with TCC in radical cystectomy specimens had to be determined. In this study, we evaluated the prevalence of prostatic involvement in radical cystectomy specimens obtained from patients with bladder TCC.
Material and Methods
Independent t test was used for statistical analysis. A p-value less than 0.05 was considered statistically significant. Statistical analysis was performed using the computer statistical package SPSS/11.0.
Results
Discussion
In a mass screening of prostate cancer in Changchun City of China, 4218 men over 50 years old were screened Subjects, whose serum PSA concentration was more than 4.1 ng/ml, were recommended to undergo transrectal ultrasound-guided systematic six-sextant biopsy of prostate. Cancer detection rate and age-adjusted cancer detect rate was 0.74% and 0.78%, respectively.13 In a report from USA (Los Angeles county), the incidence rate was highest in African Americans (116 per men per year) and lowest among Asian (Japanese, 39 per 100 000 men per year and Chinese 28 per 100 000 men per year).14 The significance of environmental factors in the development of Pca is apparent from studies in immigrants. Japanese men have a low incidence of Pca in Japan. These rates are only one-fifteenth of those of white men in the United States, and they quadruple among first and second generation Japanese immigrants to the United States.15 The reported rate of incidentally detected cancer is between 18%- 42%.2,16 We found that 12.9% of cystoprostatectomy specimens in patients with bladder TCC also harbour incidental prostate cancer. This result was much lower than overall mean frequency of incidentally detected prostate cancer in other studies. Also, much lower than the age adjusted frequency of autopsy detected prostate cancer. Several studies have examined the prevalence of latent or occult prostate cancer detected only at autopsy and estimated it to be about 25% to 30%.17
In this study, the prostate involvement by TCC had direct correlation with the grade and stage of the bladder tumour. This is in agreement with a study by Liedberg et al.18 Reported rates of prostate involvement by TCC in some studies is completely high. The prevalence of incidental PCa and its precursor, high grade intraepithelial neoplasia (HGPIN) in an autopsy series from Hungarians was 38.8%.19
However, it is worthwhile to mention that, the thickness of the pathologic slices in our study were 10mm, versus 5mm in some other studies.18 In a study by Plante et al.20 (10mm slices) the prevalence of prostate adenocarcinoma was 17.8% but it was 45% in another study in which the pathologic slices had thicknesses of 2-34 mm.21 This rate is 12.9% in our country which is probably due to the less frequency of prostate cancer in our region or taking the thicker 10mm pathologic sample cuts. In two large population based studies, the overall cancer detection rate for prostate cancer was 3.5% in Iran.7,9 The interesting finding of this study is the lower frequency of prostate adenocarcinoma in lower stages of bladder TCC (9.5% in T1 vs. 16.6% in T4 stages which is possibly due to the concurrent oncogenes in the bladder and prostate.20,21
Conclusion
References
2. Montironi R, Mazzucchelli R, Santinelli A, Scarpelli M, Beltran AL, Bostwick DG. Incidentally detected prostate cancer in cystoprostatectomies: pathological and morphometric comparison with clinically detected cancer in totally embedded specimens. Hum Pathol. 2005;36:646-54.
3. Stamey TA, Freiha FS, McNeal JE, Redwine EA, Whittemore AS, Schmid HP. Localized prostate cancer. Relationship of tumor volume to clinical significance for treatment of prostate cancer. Cancer 1993, 71(3 Suppl):933-38.
4. Cancer incidence in five continents Volume VIII. IARC Sci Publ.2002; 155:1-781.
5. Robbins AS, Yin D, Parikh-Patel A. Differences in prognostic factors and survival among White men and Black men with prostate cancer, California, 1995-2004. Am J Epidemiol. 2007;166:71-78 Epub 2007.
6. Kurahashi N, Sasazuki S, Iwasaki M, Inoue M, Tsugane S; JPHC Study Group. Green tea consumption and prostate cancer risk in Japanese men: a prospective study. Am J Epidemiol. 2008; 167:71-77.
7. Safarinejad MR. Population-based screening for prostate cancer by measuring free and total serum prostate-specific antigen in Iran. Ann Oncol. 2006;17:1166-71. Epub 2006.
8. Schoenberg M. Management of invasive and metastasis bladder cancer. In: Walsh PC, Retik AB, Stamey TA, Vaughan ED Jr, editors. Campbell's Urology.8th Ed .Philadelphia: WB Saunders. 2002 pp 2803-17.
9. Hosseini SY, Danesh AK, Parvin M, Basiri A, Javadzadeh T, Safarinejad MK et al. Incidental prostatic adenocarcinoma in patients with PSA less than 4 ng/mL undergoing radical cystoprostatectomy for bladder cancer in Iranian men. Int Braz J Urol. 2007;33:167-73.
10. Fleming ID, Cooper JS, Henson DE, Hutter RVP, Kennedy BJ, Murply GP, et al. AJCC cancer staging manual/American Joint Committee on Cancer. Fifth edition. Philadelphia, Lippincott - Raven. 1997.
11. Gleason DF, Mellinger GT. Veterans Administration Cooperative Urological Research Group. Prediction of prognosis for prostatic adenocarcinoma by combined histological grading and clinical staging 1974. J Urol 2002,167:953-58
12. Glover FE Jr, Coffey DS, Douglas LL, Cadogan M, Russell H, Tulloch T. et al. The epidemiology of prostate cancer in Jamaica. J Urol 1998, 159:1984-86.
13. Li X, Tsuji I, Kuwahara M, Zhang H, Wang H, Zhang L. et al. Mass screening of prostate cancer in Changchun City of China. Int Urol Nephrol. 2004;36:541-48.
14. Irvine RA, Yu MC, Ross RK, Coetzee GA. The CAG and GGC microsatellites of the androgen receptor gene are in linkage disequilibrium in men with prostate cancer. Cancer Res 1995, 55:1937-40.
15. Karr DJP. Prostate cancer in the United States and Japan. Adv Exp Med Biol 1992, 324:17-28
16. Kouriefs C, Fazili T, Masood S, Naseem MS, Mufti GR. Incidentally detected prostate cancer in cystoprostatectomy specimens. Urol Int. 2005;75:213-16.
17. Konety BR, Bird VY, Deorah S, Dahmoush L. Comparison of the incidence of latent prostate cancer detected at autopsy before and after the prostate specific antigen era. J Urol 2005;174:1785-88.
18. Liedberg F, Chebil G, Davidsson T, Malmström PU, Sherif A, Månsson W. Transitional cell carcinoma of the prostate in cystoprostatectomy specimens. Aktuelle Urol 2003;34:333-36.
19. Soos G, Tsakiris I, Szanto J, Turzo C, Haas PG, Dezso B. The prevalence of prostate carcinoma and its precursor in Hungary: an autopsy study. Eur Urol. 2005;48:739-44.
20. Plante P, Lesourd A, Blanchet P, Castagnola C, Coloby P, Daffer N. et al. Can the prostatic capsule be preserved during cystectomy for bladder tumors: a study of urethral and prostatic involvement in the cystectomy specimens. Prog Urol 1998, 8:47-50.
21. Abbas F, Hochberg D, Civantos F, Soloway M. Incidental prostatic adenocarcinoma in patients undergoing radical cystoprostatectomy for bladder cancer. Eur Urol 1996, 30:322-26.
Related Articles
Journal of the Pakistan Medical Association has agreed to receive and publish manuscripts in accordance with the principles of the following committees:




