Gokhan Kuran ( Dlskapi yildIrlm Beyazlt Traning and Research Hospital, Irfan Bastug cd Diskapi Ankara,Turkey )
Erkan Vuralkan ( Dlskapi yildIrlm Beyazlt Traning and Research Hospital, Irfan Bastug cd Diskapi Ankara,Turkey )
Cern Saka ( Dlskapi yildIrlm Beyazlt Traning and Research Hospital, Irfan Bastug cd Diskapi Ankara,Turkey )
Istemihan Akin ( Dlskapi yildIrlm Beyazlt Traning and Research Hospital, Irfan Bastug cd Diskapi Ankara,Turkey )
November 2007, Volume 57, Issue 11
Case Reports
Abstract
Introduction
With increasing size and bony erosion the mucocele extend outside the sinus. Significant morbidity and potential mortality may ensue if mucoceles are allowed to grow.2
The lesion may extend to the orbital and intracranial structures and lead to meningitis brain abscess or cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) fistulas.3
The main symptoms of orbital involvement are pain, swelling, exophthalmos, diplopia, and loss of vision. Proptosis is usually the chief complaint4 oculomotor nerve palsy is rare.3
We report a case of a frontal mucocele that involved the orbit and was treated by endoscopic sinus surgery and medical treatment.
Case
A 44-year-old woman presented with a two-year history of right side headache, especially at her forehead. She had experienced facial trauma three years ago, had no history of nasal and sinus surgery. Her right eye was proptotic and there was mild tenderness over the right frontal bone. Paranasal computerized tomography (CT) showed a mass causing destruction of the frontal sinus base (Figure 1). An endoscopic sinus surgery was performed. During the procedure, local and topical vasoconstricting agent was applied, agger nasi cell and anterior ethmoid cells were removed. Soft tissues in front of the frontal recess were excised and the mucocele was aspirated. There was no complication perioperatively. The patient was discharged two days after surgery. Visual field improved postoperatively (Figure 2). The postoperative paranasal CT, two months later, showed the anterior ethmoidectomy with a good aeration of the frontal sinus and absence of recurrence.
[(0)]
[(1)]
Discussion
There is some conflict among authors concerning the etiology of the mucoceles.1,2 Some suggest they develop from obstruction of the sinus ostium, whereas others believe that mucocele formation occurs when there is obstruction of the duct of a minor salivary gland located within the lining of the paranasal sinus.2 Either mechanism may result in muocele formation.
The diagnosis of mucocele is based on the history, physical examination, and radiologic findings. CT and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) are effective in detecting the lesion and in demonstrating any intracranial extension.5
Treatment for paranasal sinus mucocele involves complete removal of the sinus mucosal lining and obliteration of the sinus.6 Several treatment options are available, and the choice depends on the degree of extension.7 Some authors believe that surgery is the only effective treatment, and may range from functional endoscopic sinus surgery to craniotomy and craniofacial exposure with or without obliteration of the sinus.8 Some authors believe that an intranasal approach is the first choice, even in patients with intracranial extension7, as it is found less invasive. The authors also emphasize the possibility that the lesion can be diagnosed and completely removed without the need of craniotomy.9 On the other hand, some authors prefer a transcranial extension to anterior mucoceles with intracranial extension to ensure complete removal and to prevent recurrence.9 However, this is an extensive procedure involving an external incision, periosteal elevation, and fracturing of sinus floor in creation of the flaps.1t also has a significant morbidity as stripping of the mucocele lining occasionally leads to dural injury and CSF leaks.10 The follow-up of an oblitareted sinus can also be unreliable as imaging may not be able to distinguish an obliterated sinus from a recurrent mucocele.6
Endoscopic sinus surgery (ESS) should be considered. as a treatment option for paranasal sinus mucocele with orbital involvement. Our patient was treated by ESS without incision, CSF fistula, and other complications.
Conclusion
References
2. Aydin E, Akkuzu G, Akkuzu B, Bilezikci B. Frontal Mucocele with an accompanying orbital abscess mimicking a fronto-orbital mococele: a case report. BMC Ear Nose and Throat Disord 2006; 6:6.
3. Galie M, Mandriali S, Tieghi R, Clauser L. Giant Mucocele of the frontal sinus. J Craniojac Surg 2005; 16: 933-5.
4. Lin CJ, Kaa CH, Kang BH, Wang HW. Frontal sinus presenting as oculomotor nerve palsy. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2002; 126: 588-90.
5. Cansiz H, Yener M, Giiveny MG, Canbaz B. Giant frontoethmoid mucocele with intracranial extension: case report. Ear Nose Throat J 2003; 82: 50-2.
6. Khang JJ, Malhatra R, Warmald PJ, Selva D. Endoscopic sinus surgery for paranasal sinus mucocoele with orbital involvement. Eye 2004; 18: 877-81.
7. Koike Y, Takara K, Chiba Y, Suzuki SI, Mlirai M, Ita H. Intracranial extension of paranasaI sinus mucocele: two case reports. Surg NeuroI1996;45: 44-8.
8. Weitzel EK, Hollier LH, Calzada G,. Manalidis S. Single stage management of complex fronto-orbital mucocele,, J Craniofac Surg 2002; 13: 739-45.
9. Delfini R, Missari P, lannetti G, Ciappetta P, Cantare G. Mucoceles of the paranasal sinuses with intracranial and intraorbital extension: report of 28 cases. Neurosurgery 1993: 32: 901-6.
10. Har-EI. Endoscopic management of 108 sinus mucoceles. Laryngoscope 2001; 111: 2131-4.
Journal of the Pakistan Medical Association has agreed to receive and publish manuscripts in accordance with the principles of the following committees:




